Corvera, Huma, Inversiones Manymar, Socribo, Sol Mijas--CostaLuz Lawyes new won cases

https://www.eyeonspain.com/blogs/costaluz/21664/legal-tip-1485--all-won-cases-by-costaluz-lawyers-so-far-in-2022.aspx?messageType=5

Well done Maria.

Would it be possible to advise from this list of successful outcomes, via a cross reference header perhaps, to assist the meaning of P1 P2 TS please, so that those unfamiliar with such legal terms can understand which level of litigation has been achieved on these cases, I.e. first instance, appeal, Supreme Court.

On that note could you advise if any cases have yet achieved success (at the Supreme Court level) against your previous concerns where you identified

"Supreme Court is defending in that May 28th 2019 Court Decission that just if buyers received the actual General Guarantee document, Guarantoors are liable. This is against the full spirit and previous interpretation of Law 57/68."
as discussed in greater detail in the previous thread back in 2019

 https://www.eyeonspain.com/forums/posts-long-24102.aspx

Many thanks as ever.

I think the lack of response says a lot.

Sorry: still supre busy fighting banks and now... huge demand of residency and visa permits. 

Answering now below in bold green:

Well done Maria.

Would it be possible to advise from this list of successful outcomes, via a cross reference header perhaps, to assist the meaning of P1 P2 TS please, P1 means Phase 1 ( First Instance Court), P2 means phase 2 (Appeal Co and TS means Supreme Court. so that those unfamiliar with such legal terms can understand which level of litigation has been achieved on these cases, I.e. first instance, appeal, Supreme Court.

On that note could you advise if any cases have yet achieved success (at the Supreme Court level) against your previous concerns where you identified.

"Supreme Court is defending in that May 28th 2019 Court Decission that just if buyers received the actual General Guarantee document, Guarantoors are liable. This is against the full spirit and previous interpretation of Law 57/68."
as discussed in greater detail in the previous thread back in 2019

 https://www.eyeonspain.com/forums/posts-long-24102.aspx

Yes. Supreme Court has reiteratedly stated since then that the mere existence of the General Bank Guarantee, even if a copy of this was not handed over to the buyer, is enough for the liabilities to be displayed.

Many thanks as ever. You are very welcome always!

A very awesome blog post. We are really grateful for your blog post. You will find a lot of approaches after visiting your post. I was exactly searching for.Thanks for such post and please keep it up.

MyCCPay Portal