Accounts available before AGM?

Post reply   Start new thread
:: New - Old :: Old - New

Pages: 1 |

Forum home :: Latest threads :: Search forums
The Comments
07 Aug 2009 00:00 by superdon Star rating. 127 posts Send private message


A quick question. We have an AGM coming up next month for our community, and I have asked to see the last years accounts so that I decide if any more queries need raising at the AGM. The administrators are saying the accounts will be included with the AGM agenda and not available before  - so would be too late to add particular points to the agenda.

Is this normal, or should they be available prior to the agenda setting?

Also, when does the agenda usually become available, is there law giving a time limit?



This message was last edited by superdon on 07/08/2009.

Like 0      
07 Aug 2009 20:05 by spanishsolicitor Star rating in Murcia. 140 posts Send private message

spanishsolicitor´s avatar

Regarding notices of meetings section 16 (2) of the Horizontal Property Act provides


´The notice shall include the items to be dealt with (the agenda)…...´


In the light of the statutory guide that voting provisions are satisfied only if every owner is given the opportunity to vote, the importance of the notice provisions and due observance of them is obvious.

It is not required by the Act to include a detailed explanation on the business agenda but it must be included all business to be transacted.

The Supreme Court has declared the nullity of those resolutions passed hidden in the ‘question time’ or ‘any other businesses’ at the end of the meeting because business can be transacted only if details of it are included in the notice convening the meeting.


Section 16 (3) provides that the notice period for general meetings shall not be less than six days prior to the meeting, whereas extraordinary meetings shall be ‘with sufficient time to inform all parties involved’


That time shall be counted from the date in which the notice is received.

Depending on which court, the consequences of failing to comply with the required terms could entail:


i.              Nullity or no effect of the notice, meeting and resolutions adopted.

ii.             Avoidability, which means challenging independently each resolution within three months under section 18 (3).


There is no provision in the Act about the owners’ prior right of information about the annual accounts. Therefore it is not a legal requirement. This issue has been dealt by the Supreme Court in its ruling of 16 April 1993. The Court of Appeal of Lleida (25-Oct-2001) CA Murcia (23-Oct-2003), CA Alicante (19 01-2006) CA Madrid (27-4-2007) took the same approach´ All of these judgements refused  the owners’ right of  prior information


Section 16 (1) provides that the meeting of the commonhold association shall be held at least once a year to approve the budget and the accounts

The accounts referred in this section are those for the next and previous year. (Bear in mind that if you notice anything wrong with those accounts you must put on record your objection during the meeting, otherwhise it'll be very difficult to challenge those accounts)If you want to examine the accounts of more years you should request the Owners’ committee to examine and resolve any matter whatsoever which concerns the commonhold. For this purpose a request in writing should be sent to the president setting out clearly the items requested to be dealt with. The president shall then include them in the agenda of the following meeting (section 16 (2)

It is compulsory for the president to include such business if such a request has been made in writing and is clearly expressed.

The only legal resource available for any owner to whom a proposal has been rejected would be to take legal action through ordinary proceedings asking the court for an order which obliges the president to include the owner’s request.

Due to the slowness of Spaniard justice it must be also applied, within the action, for any required precautionary measures.

Resolutions adopted in a meeting where the president refused to transact any business could not be void if those businesses did not affect the resolutions adopted.



This message was last edited by spanishsolicitor on 07/08/2009.


Like 0      

Pages: 1 |

Post reply    Start new thread

Previous Threads

Buy to rent schemes - 7 posts
What is the point of a contract and BG!!!!!!! - 1 posts
Compatibility problem? - 0 posts
Rental Contracts - 0 posts
Reflections of WW1 - 5 posts
EOS please tell us which members are in your team - 22 posts
Business Internet - 7 posts
Manilva Feria 2009 - 1 posts
Link Appearing in My Post - 3 posts
Business Potential? - 5 posts
Doing it yourself - 13 posts
UK car hire from Bristol airport - 1 posts
Manilva wine festival - 3 posts
Inflatable Spa Jacuzzi Hot Tub - 45 posts
in search of a suitable pueblo - 11 posts
Cap and Collar Limits on Mortgages? - 5 posts
Driving a Spanish registered/insured car belonging to a friend - 5 posts
Why is fruit so bad in Spain - 22 posts
Monarch Airlines criticised by CIT Marbella - 0 posts
Replies (WHAT IS THIS ?) - 7 posts
Article re BGs - 2 posts
Article from lawyer about litigating BGs - 6 posts
"the truth at last " - 0 posts
Horizontal law and cost of lifts! - 25 posts
Toyota Yaris for sale - 4 posts

Number of posts in this thread: 2

DISCLAIMER:  All opinions posted on these message boards are the opinion solely of the poster and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Eye on Spain, its servants or agents.

1 |
Our Weekly Email Digest

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x