Anna please take me back

Blue Med Invest
Post reply   Start new thread
New - Old :: Old - New

Pages: 1 |

Residencial Santa Ana del Monte forum threads
The Comments
09 Oct 2008 12:00 AM by Darren_Michelle Star rating. 167 forum posts Send private message

anna 

i apologies profusely for anything that has gone on in the past...................please get me off of this site and back to somewhere that you can share information without it going down a single route.

i have just got in from work and as far down as i bothered to go, every bloody thread either moved onto SARC or attacking SARC so how on earth can anybody feel the need to post anything on here knowing full well what way it will go. 

So here is another thread for you all to trash with your bitching...adios and don't blame each other because you're all as bad as each other.

darren


This message was last edited by Darren_Michelle on 10/9/2008.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

09 Oct 2008 11:09 PM by briando55 Star rating in Yorkshire. 1982 forum posts Send private message

Hi Darren

There is a place where everything is on an even keel, all is friendly and well, everyone is welcome and can have a drink and a bite to eat.........my house....we are the same people we were 5 years ago.

There are emotions of ours (mine) which are very pointed and very real.....they are wrapped up in the people who have so far succeeded in takin lots of money from me for something they promised me.

What on earth is your point darren?   do you want me to be very quiet and sit in a corner waiting for someone to tell me whats good for me.

Maybe i should join a pyramid scheme and save the world?

_______________________

Best wishes, Brian

 



Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

09 Oct 2008 11:43 PM by julie anne Star rating. 1103 forum posts Send private message

Hi Darren think you are hankering back to a time when all was well .Feel free to go on Ana's site what is stopping you Perhaps you should have continued down the threads then you would understand the reasons for the anger directed at  SARC .
Have you been checked for a severe allergy to lobster  ??????




This message was last edited by julie anne on 10/9/2008.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

10 Oct 2008 9:36 AM by malc Star rating. 143 forum posts Send private message

Darren good on you,   i think we all know where you are coming from apart from the silly few on here.

JA  have you ever thought of starting your own forum/thread or even your own TV show as you seem to like the sound of your own voice and go on and on  AND THEIR ARE ALOT OF REPEATS ON TV  maybe do a double act with FIN.

Malc.




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

10 Oct 2008 3:44 PM by 4749annjoe Star rating in blackpool lancs. 50 forum posts Send private message

Hi Darren,

If you still have Anna's e-mail address, sender her one, santaanadelmonte.com has closed down.

Annjoe



Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

10 Oct 2008 4:19 PM by FriendinNeed Star rating. 789 forum posts Send private message

In view of the "blindness" shown by some, together with those who have their heads up their backsides, it is not surprising that so many have been duped. It is just unfortunate that there are many, mant innocent victims.
Why is it that despite what has happened to date, so many still object to facts and truth?
OK, SADM will go ahead, banks worlwide are flush with cash and ready to lend to whoever asks. There is no credit crunch, nobody is losing or will lose their jobs.
Now, that should keep a few happy as it is what they want to hear. Anything else will be ignored.
For those who will believe anything, just send my a blank cheque and I will guarantee to double their money. Just have to find me to collect.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

10 Oct 2008 7:14 PM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

Hi All,
I attach below the posting where we had been trying to get proof of the deposit money and Ana statese it is there but I believe we were never shown proof.  Below that I have posted a SARC document 26 July in which we raise concern that we can not find deposits only a BG deposit account. Scroll down and you can all see for yourselves our concerns that the money was not there.
Tony R17 18
 

04 Jul 2008 1:06 PM

brianmags

Adosado



I've made
226 posts

Send private message to brianmags

Hi Guys 
           this is from Annas site last night Muppet ask about deposits

Question for Anna re deposits
Yesterday at 18:59:23

Hi Anna.
Hoping you can clarify situation regarding deposit monies.
You stated on Antonio update thread deposits were thought to be in seperate account but Antonio was seeking confirmation.
You then stated on the key ready thread at a later date the monies were in a seperate account.
Can i assume you have had confirmation through Antonio as this obiously makes for good news if it has been confirmed.
Looking forward to your reply.
Regards Ken.

you picked the short straw then???

Yes Antonio confirmed that the owners (ie buyers for Herrada del Tollo only - you wil need to make this clear when you post on eye on spain) have their money in a separate bank account. There is 36,000 euros missing (thought to have been spent on construction and this is th element which is being further clarified / confirmed. I expect an update from Antonio today which I will post)
 
For info. I dont mind posting but clients of Antonios can and will make direct contact with him and those that have chosen lawyers via other groups would be better placed to take advice from their own counsel as to not do so and rely on others would be unwise. How a claim gets handled by a particular lawyer through ths process will not necessarily apply across the board at all and will only apply to those he/she represents. Owners therefore need to make sure they are pushing their own lawyer for independent information and questioning next steps etc.
 
hence my comments about quality not price!
 
Hope this helps ken
 
Anna

So it seems that if you purchased with Herrada del Tollo our monies are safe but we are still in the dark those who are not. but It might bee good news about the Build at SADM as they seem to have done things properly when it comes to Jumillia
regards Brianmags
R4 556



The meetings that SARC attended and are reported upon the SARC website have given some cause for deep thought as to outcomes for purchasers at SADM.
Several key points have been noted that impact upon the decisions to be made regarding whether to continue with the purchase or to stay as a creditor and try to regain the money paid.
It can be seen clearly in the report that the deposits, although auditable and appropriately accountable are not all sitting in a ring fenced client account. This is information was given with some discomfort by SJ/HDT but we needed to know the truth regarding the position of the deposits. When we attended the meeting we were not sure either way regarding the existence of a client account, as there had been two mutually contradicting postings on the EOS forum. We sought to clarify this and in doing so found that only a small proportion of the funds are kept in an account linked to bank guarantees.
Therefore, we are very concerned that if purchasers decide to try to get their deposits back that several factors need to be considered:
􀀢 Only a small proportion of clients money is in a clearly identified account
􀀢 Money can only come from the company trading out of difficulty or through liquidation of the company.
􀀢 If agreement can be made with creditors regarding debts the company can carry on trading.
􀀢 Liquidation of the company would take time and in the current economic climate not realise intrinsic value of assets.
􀀢 Staff, Government, Court/Administrators, Banks come before purchasers in line of payment.
􀀢 Any interest or compensation claim would come at the end of the line of payouts and as such is highly unlikely.
Taking these points into account we cannot see how it can benefit any purchasers to go down the route of trying to get back their money. We understand the wish to protect your investment in your property/ies but believe that going down the legal route will have small return, cost money and have lots of stress. As of yet no one has been able to give a good reason how it is beneficial to try to get your money back!
If on the other hand we support the continuation of SADM and we take up the offer to continue to purchase we can have, although it may have been delayed, our property. This is a much clearer and by far a better outcome for most if not all of SADM purchasers. It has been made clear to us that SADM is a legal development; the licences are there, the water is there, and that the location is desirable and not part of the coastal property bubble.
It would therefore, seem prudent for all purchasers to actively seek to get SADM built and ensure that liquidation of the company does not occur. We may not be happy with the situation that we find our selves in caused, primarily by the credit crunch and banks, but we can try to ensure that our money is safe by getting SADM built.
With regard to solicitors it is essential to realise that if you decide to continue with your purchase the legal fees should be less and thus there could be a conflict of interests. Think very carefully about what you want and what is best for you, not your legal representative who is getting paid. If you do decide to continue with your (the purchase of your property) property, it would be a good idea to ask about a reduction in your legal costs, as you will not be going through a protracted legal procedure. Why for example pay 10% of your deposit if you are not pursuing a claim through the Courts?
23 July 2008 SARC Admin.
















Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

10 Oct 2008 7:19 PM by FriendinNeed Star rating. 789 forum posts Send private message

More earth shattering HISTORY there then.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

10 Oct 2008 8:23 PM by arlene2804 Star rating. 127 forum posts Send private message

How can they have a bank guarantee account they issued very few bank guarantees and none at all to my knowledge to anyone leaving a deposit in 2007. Go to the right solicitor and you may see the information you requested, but after your famous lunch meeting where you ask about the money on deposit and to quote Linda " When asked if the deposit account was there Almudena became very uncomfortable, body language shifting and as far as my memory serves me at no time said the account did not exist.  She gave answers as to where the money had gone and stressed that it was accountable for  and that those accounts are in the public domain. 
 


You never responded to this statement.

Arlene


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

10 Oct 2008 8:38 PM by FriendinNeed Star rating. 789 forum posts Send private message

"She gave answers as to where the money had gone and stressed that it was accountable for  and that those accounts are in the public domain"
Check with a good lawyer and that could read, that it is accountable as to where the money had gone, period and that there are accounts in the public domain.
Doesn't necessarily mean that the account which is claimed to be "accountable" is one of the accounts in the public domain.
Check the terminology.


This message was last edited by FriendinNeed on 10/10/2008.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

10 Oct 2008 9:36 PM by joanniemac Star rating. 241 forum posts Send private message

Hi All, Anna stated that she had proof of the account with purchasers deposits in it. Is it possible that our dear friends at HdT denied its existence  to prevent  purchasers demanding the immediate return of their monies thus forcing HdT into immediate liquidation? I seem to remember a statement from HdT stating our money was safe! Cheers Joanniemac


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

10 Oct 2008 9:40 PM by julie anne Star rating. 1103 forum posts Send private message

You are spot on Joannie . Everyone should check if their lawyer has investigated this .




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

Pages: 1 |
Post reply   Start new thread


Previous Threads

SARC meeting with Almu - 2 posts
IWMMB - but still want a house - 30 posts
update on those with bank guarantees - 46 posts
We are all on the same side?? - 7 posts
The SARC dream is over - 0 posts
NO MONEY IN THE POT SO HOW DO YOU GET IT BACK? - 30 posts
Land Ownership - 5 posts
Mischief 2 - 12 posts
To someone who will never see his dream - 0 posts
PETITION FOR INTRODUCTION TO MEN WITH WHITE COATS - 11 posts
Computers - 19 posts
I Want My Money Back - 151 posts
tv show - 5 posts
Possibly the biggest joke of the year. - 16 posts
Interesting newspaper article - 1 posts
SARC - 4 posts
Reasons banks give for not paying out on BGs - 41 posts
shopping on China ebay and save. - 31 posts
Help please re urbanisation rule liability - 51 posts
holidayrentalhomes.com - 8 posts
insurance when purchasing. - 1 posts
Area Information Reqired - 3 posts
Information, please? - 81 posts
Playing around! - 5 posts
Legal tip 277. Low cost action against Banks. Manifesto by Costaluzlawyers - 0 posts

12 posts were found:


1 |
Our Weekly Email Digest
Name:
Email:


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x