SARC LEADERS

Blue Med Invest
Post reply   Start new thread
New - Old :: Old - New

Pages: 1 |

Residencial Santa Ana del Monte forum threads
The Comments
31 Dec 2009 12:00 AM by MAGICMEG Star rating in Scotland. 546 forum posts Send private message

Tony and Brianmags , I can't believe that neither of you have commented on recent events .Somehow I don't think you can explain this one away as just another HdT/SJ blip !!!!  Did you guys know about this surely it was mentioned in one of your many " most significant and important " meetings held to date .  

Hope you feel well and truly misled as that is what you have inflicted on other purchasers for years . No news from Almu Tony !!!!!!!! What is her excuse this time .......... on second thoughts don't bother no one gives a sh## what she has to say anymore .

Have either of you taken the time to read through the years of drivel on your SARCO web site ? I have and it now reads more like a comedy sketch  .Not one single thing was fact or reality .You guys have been had thank God everyone else stopped listening to you years ago and started living in the real world . Enjoy planet Zorg  with empress Almu as your supreme leader . Bah bah bah

PS I will give FIN your very best regards as I am sure you  have now developed a little more respect for his point of view .Good Luck suckers .MM



_______________________

  Nothing surprises me anymore  

     but I am willing to accept that sometimes (although not very often ) I can be  wrong !



Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

31 Dec 2009 10:49 AM by joanie666 Star rating. 231 forum posts Send private message

Hello All

It's a while since I logged on (probably four months or so) but I logged on this morning hoping to see that some people may have got a well earned christmas present or at least the hope of having some of their hard earned money returned.

I thought at least by now Tony and Brian may have had the self-respect to stop spining complete nonsense to everyone moving forward.

I thought that program Benidorm made the English look stupid but Brian and Tony you do more than that. lets hope when the NHS has to save 20 billion that you two are not at the helm.

There ae some important things that need to be considered... The expropriation of land never took place. The legal process for this was reversed a long time ago and environmental agencies complained to the regional junta with regards to a lack of water. Regardless of finances...... santa ana del monte jumilla golf will never ever get built. They will not get approval from environmental perspective and they do not own the land the golf course is due to be built on (how therefore can they build a blood y golf course) the only thing san jose are doing is trying to play people to ensure they get signatures so dont go into liquidation. They know full well that santa ana will never go ahead...Tony they ahve played you from day one.

I then read Ton's self important newsletter on his website. The funiest part is when he calls the legal professional for acting dishonestly and not having integrity and agrees with Almun's opinion that some 'have their own agenda'.........He deserves everything he gets.


 



This message was last edited by joanie666 on 31/12/2009.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

31 Dec 2009 1:32 PM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

Hi Joanie 666,

May I I first wish you a Happy New Year and say how pleased I am that you got your money back from your BG.

As for the remarks that you make, I am sorry that you feel the need to try to distract purchasers from the only point that matters; the settlement offer. 

Everything else is a distraction aimed at trying to prevent those of us without BG's from saving our money. SARC have said for some time that there are those who are trying to prevent SADM going ahead but we believe that their actions will not prevail.

Given the choice of a settlement agreement or the chaos of liquidation and the probable loss of our money, that  it is the interests of all purchasers to remain calm and wait for the agreement to be put to them. 

As I said anything else is a distraction & the only important issue for those of us without BG's is how can we get out of this mess with a positive outcome.

SARC is a purchaser group, independant of HdT and working on behalf of its membership.

 I WANT A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL

Tony R17 18




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

31 Dec 2009 2:02 PM by Laird Dave of Lochaber Star rating in San Miguel De Salina.... 180 forum posts Send private message

Jesus Tony, are you really that blinkered that you believe all the court actions against SADM are just a distraction to stop SARC members from getting their houses built.

I thought you were a little bit naive now I know you are either completely stupid or else you must be linked very closely to San Jose Grupo, to make such  a load of b*****s as this post of yours.

Words fail me. I disagreed with the way FIN & MM sometimes posted and also some of their content that was a personal attack on me and my family but I'm afraid they had you pegged from day one as do most of the viewers of this part of EOS.

I used to wish that you got what you wanted but now I just wish that you get what you deserve!

Dave




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

31 Dec 2009 2:06 PM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

Hi Dave,

You have a BG,  I believe you have actioned it, so you have your money back. Have you read the post by cargic on Sarco thread about the Jumilla town hall's response and support for SADM?

I have cut & posted it for you and highlighted the key points

...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Jumilla City Council will seek the annulment of the proceedings of the Supreme Court ruling on Santa Ana del Monte Jumilla Golf, for not being called on it, according to municipal sources. The Supreme Court decided to provisionally suspend the Partial Plan and the Urban Action Plan Santa Ana del Monte Jumilla Golf because the potential shortfall would affect water interest. The first application left Pascual Carrión, a pastor who has a cattle farm in the area.

The Supreme in his car as a precautionary measure agreed to suspend the agreement of the City of Jumilla plenary, adopted at its meeting of 5 December 2006 which was finally adopted the Partial Plan Santa Ana del Monte Jumilla Golf, as well as the agreement of the Local Government Committee adopted at its meeting on 13 December following, which approved the Urban Action Program Implementation Unit Single Partial Plan.
A report by the lawyers for the local authority indicates that "the Administrative Division of the Superior Court of Justice in Murcia, first section, breached the duty of notice under Article 90 of the Law of the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction. The Mayor of Jumilla, socialist Francisco Abellán, states that "has violated the right to effective judicial protection, generating an apparent helplessness, and has violated Article 53 of the Constitution." Abellán announced that "the City will submit to the Supreme Court a motion of annulment of proceedings to declare the proceedings void
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................

Regarding being niave I think that you should be carefull when making such a crass remark. Perhaps it is helpfull to be aware of all the issues and participants in an event before jumping to conclusions.

 The SARC report will put this latest " issue" into perspective.

The only thing for us to be concerned with is the settlement agreement and what is in it.

 I WANT A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL

Tony R17 18


 



This message was last edited by TonyMal on 31/12/2009.



This message was last edited by TonyMal on 31/12/2009.



This message was last edited by TonyMal on 31/12/2009.



This message was last edited by TonyMal on 31/12/2009.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

31 Dec 2009 2:29 PM by Laird Dave of Lochaber Star rating in San Miguel De Salina.... 180 forum posts Send private message

Hi Tony

Yes I do have a bank guarantee, yes I have actioned it, no thanks to San Jose's deliberate stalling of the cancelation of contracts, but No you are wrong I'm still awaiting my money back, as are many others with bank guarantees. It's not the easy process you seem to think.

Yes I have read the article posted by cargic. Doesn't actually mean much all it says is that the Jumilla Town Council disagree with the  Murcia Courts and have asked for an anullment of their suspension of the partial plans for SADM. It does actually mean that anything will be built there or that there is any finance for continuing the build, does it?

Perhaps you should read the article at www.simplynetworking.es/news.php Now that court has suspended the plan until adequate water supply has been shown. And the Mayor of Jumilla backpedalled on this when questioned.  If you remember Almundena and San Jose Grupo said quite catagorically that the water problems are resolved, does look that way to the courts does it.

Why should I be carefull about making crass remarks about your naivity are you again going to threaten to sue?

Why is the only issue to be concerned with  the settlement agreement. Do you really believe that the majority of purchasers will accept anything that this crooked company offer in the future having been well and truely shafted and conned by them in the past. If you believe that then once again I repeat you are stupid. I have had a letter from the company asking me for my details so that they can make this settlement offer to me. Now this is the company that have resolved my contract and should know that I do not qualify to receive the offer. Now thats stupid as well.

Dave

 




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

31 Dec 2009 2:38 PM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

Hi Dave,

I am glad that you BG is being actioned and that you should soon have your money back.

Going back to the comment of being naive, I am amazed that you put so much selective faith in the writings of the press. I suggest that your personal circumstances have effected your objectivity and make you very bitter to HdT. However, it is not HdT that you are trying to damage but the rest of the purchasers for your own satisfaction.

I am reposting the article so that it does not get "lost down the thread"

All the bst

Tony 

...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Jumilla City Council will seek the annulment of the proceedings of the Supreme Court ruling on Santa Ana del Monte Jumilla Golf, for not being called on it, according to municipal sources. The Supreme Court decided to provisionally suspend the Partial Plan and the Urban Action Plan Santa Ana del Monte Jumilla Golf because the potentialshortfall would affect water interest. The first application left Pascual Carrión, a pastor who has a cattle farm in the area.
The Supreme in his car as a precautionary measure agreed to suspendthe agreement of the City of Jumilla plenary, adopted at its meeting of 5 December 2006 which was finally adopted the Partial Plan Santa Ana del Monte Jumilla Golf, as well as the agreement of the Local Government Committee adopted at its meeting on 13 December following, which approved the Urban Action Program Implementation Unit Single Partial Plan.
A report by the lawyers for the local authority indicates that "the Administrative Division of the Superior Court of Justice in Murcia, first section, breached the duty of notice under Article 90 of the Law of the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction.The Mayor of Jumilla, socialist Francisco Abellán, states that "has violated the right to effective judicial protection, generating an apparent helplessness, and has violated Article 53 of the Constitution."Abellán announced that "the City will submit to the Supreme Court a motion of annulment of proceedings to declare the proceedings void
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Regarding being niave I think that you should be carefull when making such a crass remark. Perhaps it is helpfull to be aware of all the issues and participants in an event before jumping to conclusions.
 The SARC report will put this latest " issue" into perspective.
The only thing for us to be concerned with is the settlement agreement and what is in it.
 I WANT A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
Tony R17 18

 

 




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

31 Dec 2009 2:50 PM by auntielinda Star rating in San Miguel de Salina.... 646 forum posts Send private message

To All Purchasers SADM

please pleas please for your own good, dont sign a thing from these theives make em go into liquidation they say they have 30,000,000 in assets so 70,000,000 should be easily raised to pay the creditors

make em pay for their mis demeanor make up your own minds dont let some other purchaser influence your decision not even if they think they are being helpful. Everyman for himself comes to mind b....r the rest look after No 1

 



_______________________

Great Auntie Linda

 



Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

31 Dec 2009 3:09 PM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

Hi Linda,

 It is not in the interests of any one without a BG to have the company liquidated. Your  remark is driven by a personal vendeta against the company  and is extremely poor advice. As for looking after number 1, well you have a BG, so your comment is very brave when you have nothing to loose. As for the value of assets and realising them at this presnt time or even getting anything near the rel value, well that is not going to happen.

For those of us without BG's we have 2 options; an agreed and structured resolution of our position or chaos and the probalbe loss of all. Now personally I go for a planned and structured resolution but then its up to each purchaser to decide which option they prefer.

 I WANT A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL

Tony R17 18

Oh and lets not loose the info posted earlier

 

Jumilla City Council will seek the annulment of the proceedings of the Supreme Court ruling on Santa Ana del Monte Jumilla Golf, for not being called on it, according to municipal sources. The Supreme Court decided to provisionally suspend the Partial Plan and the Urban Action Plan Santa Ana del Monte Jumilla Golf because the potentialshortfall would affect water interest. The first application left Pascual Carrión, a pastor who has a cattle farm in the area.
The Supreme in his car as a precautionary measure agreed to suspendthe agreement of the City of Jumilla plenary, adopted at its meeting of 5 December 2006 which was finally adopted the Partial Plan Santa Ana del Monte Jumilla Golf, as well as the agreement of the Local Government Committee adopted at its meeting on 13 December following, which approved the Urban Action Program Implementation Unit Single Partial Plan.
A report by the lawyers for the local authority indicates that "the Administrative Division of the Superior Court of Justice in Murcia, first section, breached the duty of notice under Article 90 of the Law of the Contentious Administrative Jurisdiction.The Mayor of Jumilla, socialist Francisco Abellán, states that "has violated the right to effective judicial protection, generating an apparent helplessness, and has violated Article 53 of the Constitution."Abellán announced that "the City will submit to the Supreme Court a motion of annulment of proceedings to declare the proceedings void
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Regarding being niave I think that you should be carefull when making such a crass remark. Perhaps it is helpfull to be aware of all the issues and participants in an event before jumping to conclusions.
 The SARC report will put this latest " issue" into perspective.
The only thing for us to be concerned with is the settlement agreement and what is in it.
 I WANT A POSITIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL
Tony R17 18

 


 



This message was last edited by TonyMal on 31/12/2009.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

31 Dec 2009 3:13 PM by Laird Dave of Lochaber Star rating in San Miguel De Salina.... 180 forum posts Send private message

Ha ! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!

What a load of Tosh Tony.

Perhaps you should practice what you preach regarding selective faith in the writings of the press.

Being bitter towards HdT is correct but it has nothing to do with my personal circumstances but to do with the facts that this company is crooked, is run by crooks for their own crooked ends.

How dare you say  "However, it is not HdT that you are trying to damage but the rest of the purchasers for your own satisfaction." this is untrue and very slanderous. I get no satisfaction from any purchaser whos has money tied up in this sorry tale not even you, although after these last comments  I'm begining to wonder.

Please retract this untrue statement.

Dave 




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

31 Dec 2009 3:24 PM by MAGICMEG Star rating in Scotland. 546 forum posts Send private message

Dave and Auntie linda Not sure we should waste anymore time on Tony (as i think it may be time for the men in white coats again )

In view of recent events the court and administrators are extremely unlikely to agree  to any settlement agreement now . Any agreement had to be accompanied by a solid future plan including realistic time scales and finance .This is now impossible .Tony is either clean off his head or is on some way on the SJ payroll . There will be no agreement now  not that any one with half a brain would have accepted it any way .I think at last this whole sorry tale is coming to an end and HdT will be put into liquidation very soon .As Dave rightly says Tony will soon get what best befits his lies , arrogance  and blind foolish trust in the crooks  ,,,,,,,,,, Nada. 

 



_______________________

  Nothing surprises me anymore  

     but I am willing to accept that sometimes (although not very often ) I can be  wrong !



Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

Pages: 1 |
Post reply   Start new thread


Previous Threads

Water for Santa Ana Del Monte Golf - NOT NOW!!! - 1 posts
Look what I got today - 20 posts
Merry Christmas - 6 posts
New photo, not of SADM, but of the potential view from SADM! - 2 posts
HOUSE PRICES BOUNCE BACK - 4 posts
SARC December update report now available - 0 posts
ARRIBA HOMES - 6 posts
HdT Settlement agreement - 27 posts
Photos for Kayem - 11 posts
Good Day - 8 posts
"Who is really to blame"? - 0 posts
Latest Update from my Solicitor - 10 posts
Users banned - 14 posts
THIS REALLY OUGHT TO STOP. - 4 posts
Why are Fin & CL offering no alternative & are trying to control the forum? - 9 posts
Ahenda (Not of the hidden type) - 2 posts
Why - 0 posts
Piles - 1 posts
Why do the Usual Suspects offer no solution just negativity and abuse? - 8 posts
What are SARC and SJ/HdT really up to ? - 14 posts
SARC Otober report / Settlement Agreement to be sent to Purcashers - 47 posts
Judge returns to work - 1 posts
Santa Ana licenses and projects to be revoked and cancelled - 34 posts
SARC - 9 posts
Hopeless - 12 posts

11 posts were found:


1 |
Our Weekly Email Digest
Name:
Email:


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x