Bank Guarantees explained

Post reply   Start new thread
:: New - Old :: Old - New

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | Next |

Forum home :: Latest threads :: Search forums
The Comments
03 Sep 2008 12:00 AM by Lawbird Star rating. 59 posts Send private message

Lawbird´s avatar
Bank Guarantees: All That You Ever Wanted to Know but Were Afraid to Ask.

LAWBIRD LEGAL SERVICES
Friday 27th June 2008

Brief Overview of Law 57/1968

Law 57/68 rules the protection of stage payments in off-plan properties. This very short law of only seven articles was enacted to secure the stage payments of purchasers should a developer file for creditor protection. BGs are not applicable to resale properties, only to off-plan.

Article 1 of the said law establishes that developers will have to provide free of charge to the purchaser/s a Bank Guarantee or Insurance Policy (henceforth BG for either) to guarantee the refund of their stage payments plus 6% interest in the event of the developer becoming insolvent. The Building Act (Law 38/99) actually amends this percentage in its first additional disposition and it will be the legal interest set in the Budget Law published annually by Spain’s Law Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado). These legal interests are simple annual interests, not compounded.

In compliance with article 4, these guarantees will be cancelled upon the granting by the town hall of the First Occupancy Licence. Normally at completion the lawyer appointed by the purchasers will hand back these guarantees to the developer’s representative.

Article 7 stipulates that the rights set forth in this law cannot be waived by the purchasing party meaning they cannot be renounced.

Who requests the BG?

It is the duty of the conveyance lawyer you appoint to request the BG from the developer. The developer in turn will arrange with the bank underwriting the whole development or with an insurance company the set-up of these BGs.

Normally in an off-plan property after having paid the initial security deposit which strikes the property off the market, you are typically required to make interim payments on 30% of the value of the property. These payments are normally made in regular instalments (i.e 3 or 4). Your lawyer will then request from the developer one BG at a time to cover each and every instalment including the initial security deposit. So normally your lawyer will one BG for each of your stage payments securing the full amount.

As per this law a developer cannot charge to issue a mandatory BG. Issuing a BG has high set-up fees for the developer as they must allocate an amount of money in a special bank account besides being a loss of cost of opportunity for them. This perhaps helps to explain why some developers may not be eager to hand them out unless the purchaser’s lawyer has requested it from them.

What does a BG cover?

It secures the full stage payment paid by yourself including the applicable VAT (currently at 7%) on said amounts. On top of this legal interests are applied.

When are the BGs issued?

BGs are issued normally 30 or 40 days after you have made the down payment they are securing. Naturally a bank cannot issue a BG if you have yet not paid the stage payment. In other words, a BG cannot be issued prior to handing over the stage payment to the developer.

What should a BG ideally include?

A BG should be individualised for each particular purchaser. It should include the following details:

1.- Name & surname of purchaser/s.
2.- Their nationality & passport number/s.
3.- Their address.
4.- The exact amount in Euros which is being guaranteed.
5.- The name and address of the development where they are purchasing.
6.- Developer’s name.
7.- The details of the residential unit they are purchasing. i.e. flat number seven, Block 3, second floor.
8.- Name & seal of the Bank or Insurance Company guaranteeing said stage payments.
9.- The number of the Registro Especial de Avales (if it’s a Bank Guarantee) as well as the bank account details where the secured amounts will be lodged.

Types of BG

As the Law 57/68 doesn’t specifically rule which type of BG should be issued by the developer, this allows for two types:

1.- Ordinary BG.-This BG cannot be claimed upon immediately by the purchaser in case the developer defaults. Prior to executing it, it actually requires a judge’s ruling stating that the bank ought to refund –or not- the off-plan purchaser. This means that the purchaser will actually have to engage the services of a litigation lawyer who will claim upon said BG in a special executive procedure. The litigation expenses are borne initially by the purchaser albeit may normally be claimed back from the bank together with the full refund of the stage payments and legal interests. This is the most common type of BG which is set up and one cannot argue that it is illegal or unlawful, it is just less practical.

2.-“Aval a primer requerimiento”.-This is just an ordinary BG which includes a special clause by which it can be claimed upon immediately by the conveyance lawyer without the need of a judge’s ruling. This is really the ideal BG to have because it saves the hassle, stress and additional expenses of having to go through a court procedure, even if it’s an executive one.

I am building my own dream-villa, should the constructor hand me a BG?

No. In this particular case in which a person has bought a plot of land and they are building their own detached villa the Building Act regards them as a self-developer. The constructor is hired by them and is acting on their behalf. In this particular case BGs are not applicable as the purchaser is the developer. However, the law will require them to arrange the mandatory ten-year insurance (Seguro Decenal). A lack of compliance attaining this mandatory insurance will result in this self-developer being forbidden to sell their house within the next ten years.

Common BG Pitfalls

There are far too many to be included in this brief BG legal overview. Please take professional advise from your appointed lawyer on this matter.

To name a few:

1.The BG has a wording that makes it subject to the granting of the Certificate of End of Construction (CEC) instead of the mandatory LFO. Law 57/68 sets forth in article 4 that the BG should be valid until the granting of the LFO. The problem is that a CEC, which is the prerequisite prior to the granting of the LFO, doesn’t mean the development is regarded as legal. In fact the CEC is issued by the arquitect in charge of the development who is actually on the developer’s payroll. Besides contradicting the specific wording of the said law this clause should not be accepted as a development in despite of having a CEC issued may not be legal. Moreover, for the CEC to be rendered valid it has to be signed by the architect, technical architect (aparejador) and must be approved and countersigned with the official seals of both the Arquitect’s regional College and Technical Arquitect’s regional College. So a CEC only signed by one of them would not be deemed valid.

2.The LFO is conditioned to an Expiry Date. This is fairly common and contradicts blatantly both the Spirit and Wording of the law. The problem with expiry dates is that almost all developments are handed late for one reason or another. The danger in including expiry dates is that if the development isn’t finished on time as per the clauses in the Private Purchase Contract and the deadline is overrun the BG will cease to be valid. However this is a subject of hot controversy between lawyers and judges as there are many who believe that the inclusion of an expiry date is null and void as it goes against the law. This will remain contentious until there is a string of likeminded rulings. In the meantime, I would advise to renew your BGs to ensure your financial interests are secured at all times should the worst occur.

3.Cowboy Insurance Companies. On the wake of the long-lasting property boom many such cases have been reported in the media. Invariably these Insurance Companies are companies incorporated abroad specifically to be outside the reach of the Spanish Jurisdiction. On doing this they waive Spain’s requirements and should the developer default, they are purposely unable to back up the BGs or Insurance Policies they have undersigned. The process to make them accountable for is long, winding, expensive and often fruitless. That is why it is most advisable that whichever Bank or Insurance Company that issues these BGs is located within Spanish territory as a precaution. The Spanish Government has a list of unauthorised insurance companies in its website which it regularly updates that are not registered or authorised to operate in Spain.

4.Group or Collective BG whose beneficiary is not the purchaser.- This happens typically when an entrepreneur buys from the developer at a discounted price the whole development or a large number of units to resell it abroad in the UK or Ireland at a higher price. The BG will be under the name of this company and not under the name of the final individualised purchaser as it ideally should. These BGs are normally for a very high amount of money (millions of Euros) as they group various residential units.

CONCLUSION

A BG is a very important document for the purchaser as it secures their stage payments should the developer file for bankruptcy. We cannot stress enough the importance of attaining a BG. So even if you are requested to pay a BG, which is unlawful, we would advise you to do so because it will act as a safety net securing your financial interests should the developer go into receivership.



This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

_______________________
Lawbird Spanish Lawyers http://www.lawbird.com



Like 0      
03 Sep 2008 4:33 PM by spanishsolicitor Star rating in Murcia. 140 posts Send private message

spanishsolicitor´s avatar
I'm sorry dear colleague but I think there is a mistake in your definition of an ordinary BG 

You said 

'1.- Ordinary BG.-This BG cannot be claimed upon immediately by the purchaser in case the developer defaults. Prior to executing it, it actually requires a judge’s ruling stating that the bank ought to refund –or not- the off-plan purchaser. This means that the purchaser will actually have to engage the services of a litigation lawyer who will claim upon said BG in a special executive procedure' 

In principle it is not always necessary a judge's ruling in order to execute this kind of BG. Many people have obtained the refund of the monies without any judicial intervention. Just when the bank refuses to honor you have to start proceedings.

I take this opportunity  to clarify that the Reservation Fee also  has to be included in the amount guaranteed




This message was last edited by spanishsolicitor on 9/3/2008.

_______________________
www.fljordan.com



Like 0      
03 Sep 2008 4:51 PM by Lawbird Star rating. 59 posts Send private message

Lawbird´s avatar

Dear colleague, yes thank you, we are fully aware of this and you are entirely correct as well of course. Addressing both of the points you raise:

However, we are finding out that banks are with the ongoing credit crunch increasingly reluctant to honour Bank Guarantees, perhaps your experience may be different. I leave you this article of El País newspaper on the matter. Our legal article was written late June to reflect the ongoing reality -at least in our experience-. And in our experience Banks are seemingly reluctant to honour BG execution unless it includes the afore mentioned clause. The Bank of Spain seems to think likewise as per the El País article. 

We are also fully ware that the reservation fee or security deposit is also included in the BG. If you read our article carefully it specifically states it:


Who requests the BG ? .... "Your lawyer will then request from the developer one BG at a time to cover each and every instalment including the initial security deposit."

Best regards


This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/3/2008.

_______________________
Lawbird Spanish Lawyers http://www.lawbird.com



Like 0      
03 Sep 2008 10:57 PM by andenca Star rating in London. 44 posts Send private message

Dear solicitors, if you are telling me that the conveyance lawyer is the one to ask for the BG,  I would like to know why this lawyer doesn't ask directly for the best type of BG "a primer requerimiento" as this would be the best way to protect the purchaser, who is suppossed to be the lawyer's client, is it not? Unless lawyers are expecting to make some extra profit from litigation procedures.

We consumers are expecting that our lawyers will not only put all the paperwork together for us, but they will help us with the benefit of their experience from problems encountered in previous occasions, however, looking into all the threads in EOS, everyone has the same problems inspite of everyone having Spanish solicitors. Where is the pride of a job well done within the profession???





Like 0      
03 Sep 2008 11:01 PM by andenca Star rating in London. 44 posts Send private message

Dear solicitors, if you are telling me that the conveyance lawyer is the one to ask for the BG,  I would like to know why this lawyer doesn't ask directly for the best type of BG "a primer requerimiento" as this would be the best way to protect the purchaser, who is suppossed to be the lawyer's client, is it not? Unless lawyers are expecting to make some extra profit from litigation procedures.

We consumers are expecting that our lawyers will not only put all the paperwork together for us, but they will help us with the benefit of their experience from problems encountered in previous occasions, however, looking into all the threads in EOS, everyone has the same problems inspite of everyone having Spanish solicitors. Where is the pride of a job well done within the profession???





Like 0      
04 Sep 2008 8:31 AM by Lawbird Star rating. 59 posts Send private message

Lawbird´s avatar

Andenca, as per our article the standardly issued BGs do not have said clause. I'm sure your conveyance lawyer did his best and requested it from the developer. However, developers have no obligation whatsoever to grant BGs with said additional clause. Law 57/68 only obliges him them to grant a BG securing the interim stage payments, that's all, it doesn't go into details (this law is in fact very short,only 7 articles of which a couple are no longer in force). 

As our colleague Spanishsolicitor rightly pointed out, BGs are meant to be honoured by banks on executing them for the valid legal reasons. In principle there is no need for a prior Judge's ruling. In despite of this, post credit crunch, law firms are finding increasing difficulties to execute BGs which may entail having to resort to a litigation procedure to execute them. Banks at times are just delaying the execution process buying time to hopefully wear out the BGs beneficiary but actually end up honouring them after many months of legal wrangle without having to resort to litigation.

That is why it's rather pointless, in our opinion, to write an article on BGs in late June 2008 and define them as immediately executable when it is apparent this is no longer the case as highlighted in the newspaper link from the 18th of July 2008 we provided yesterday. 

So basically solicitors cannot legally force a developer to include that clause; couple this with an ongoing credit crunch and as a result we have process which becomes drawn out. In any case banks can be sentenced to bear the expenses of the legal proceeding on having denied unjustifiably the execution of a BG.



_______________________
Lawbird Spanish Lawyers http://www.lawbird.com



Like 0      
04 Sep 2008 11:30 AM by mariadecastro Star rating in Algeciras (Cadiz). 9402 posts Send private message

mariadecastro´s avatar
Regardless what the BG documents actually say or not, it is Law 57/68 which give rights to clients. It is not what Bank or Insurers arbitarily want to grant to Consumers but what Law obligues developer to provide. So any clause or characteristic of that Guarantee against that imperative Law is null and void.

As a consequence:  I would not worry too much about  "a primer requerimiento"clauses or not, as it is fully clear in provision 3.2  of Law 57/68:

"Insurance contract or Bank Guarantee attached to a document whish irrefutably credit " non initium of works" or " non completion in time" will have executive force according to the Civil Procedural  Act. "

By the way, provision 3.1 of same Law ( from 1968!!) also says:

 Once the initium date or expiration deadline is met and house is not started or finished on time, the cessionary  ( buyer)  will be able to choose between contract cancellation and refund of all money paid plus 6 % interests ( now Legal interests, after General Building Act 1999)  or granting of contract extension , which will be exposed in  an addittional clause of the contract, with specification of the new completion deadline.
 

This last free translation is specially dedicated to those of you  who are fond on grace periods to developers. 



This message was last edited by mariadecastro on 9/4/2008.

_______________________

Maria L. de Castro, JD, MA

Lawyer

Director www.costaluzlawyers.es

El blog de Maria



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 8:59 AM by spanishsolicitor Star rating in Murcia. 140 posts Send private message

spanishsolicitor´s avatar
Lawbird said  'However, we are finding out that banks are with the ongoing credit crunch increasingly reluctant to honor Bank Guarantees, perhaps your experience may be different.'
 
There are no many banks here refusing to honor their BGs yet but I do reckon they'll be prone to fail to perform as you said.
Nowadays, expired BGs  are our main concern. Developers stop works because they have no money enough due lack of buyers, they are forcing buyers  to accept later completion dates in writing. So if you want to have your BG renovated you are unfairly compelled to wait longer than you expected.
Our experience in that issue is an absolute refusal from the bank to refund the monies guaranteed when you submit an out-of-dated BG, for this reason we are suing banks and we'll see the outcomes. At least we are dealing with banks not with impecunious developers.
I do like your recent posts with a great deal of information


_______________________
www.fljordan.com



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 9:34 AM by mariadecastro Star rating in Algeciras (Cadiz). 9402 posts Send private message

mariadecastro´s avatar
There is case Law on the nullity of expiration deadlines in Bank guarantees.

_______________________

Maria L. de Castro, JD, MA

Lawyer

Director www.costaluzlawyers.es

El blog de Maria



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 9:45 AM by andenca Star rating in London. 44 posts Send private message

I am still not convinced that it is all developpers and bank's fault. You, solicitors, have a very important role to play. You hold all the information, you know the law and the small printing, as well as the possible caveats from the different options, and still we consumers (all) are encountering the same problems. You need to have the interest of your client at heart (I am talking about the consumer). If you were to advice every one planning to buy off-plan not to go ahead until the best choice of BG was in place, developpers could not do anything but to take that option. But life is not easy and there are conflict of interest everywhere so lets be mature enought to stop the "not me" excuse. 

It is really great to see/read your discussions here and sharing of information, but don't you think it is a bit late for your clients? You should do this before the client signs the contract as to avoid problems down the line. We call it multidisciplinary team work.



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 9:50 AM by mariadecastro Star rating in Algeciras (Cadiz). 9402 posts Send private message

mariadecastro´s avatar
Andenca.... unfortunately..... I need to fully agree with you. THAT HAS BEEN THE PROBLEM.

Best,

Maria

_______________________

Maria L. de Castro, JD, MA

Lawyer

Director www.costaluzlawyers.es

El blog de Maria



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 11:07 AM by Chrissie1 Star rating in UK. 384 posts Send private message

Chrissie1´s avatar
Andenca

I have to congratulate you on your posting.  We are supposed to be able to TRUST that the lawyer looks after their client and makes sure that a BG is sought.  Unfortunately we have had a problem in that we asked for a BG on a lot of occasions but always got told they would do it but they never did.  We should I believe have been given all the necessary information at the outset of paying the first lot of money. We trusted that lawyers were being paid to look after the client but they do not.  What chance do we have when we as clients do not know all of this when we are first buying a property after all it is one of the most important documents you can have for your safety.

Chrissie

 

_______________________

               
Chrissie   



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 11:23 AM by Lawbird Star rating. 59 posts Send private message

Lawbird´s avatar
It is not matter of being mature or ducking the head in the sand Andenca. The developer is not obliged to include said clause and we cannot force them to.

In any case the problem is that banks, in general, are not executing them forcing our clients to litigate in general. This is factual. A couple of years back things were different and banks had no problems to execute them normally, post credit crunch it's not immediate. 

We have always requested BGs for our clients. Our problem is not lacking them, it's that we are unable to execute them now as they should be forcing us in many cases to litigate to enforce them. Something which is not exclusive to us and law firms all over the country can confirm this point, hence our article and the link to a national newspaper. Spanishsolicitor is also having the same problem as we are.

We have no "conflicts of interests" as you bluntly point out. All Lawbird's clients are self-generated leads over internet through our various webpages or else referred to us by existing clients which are happy with our legal service. We've been replying to legal queries through marbella-lawyers.com on a daily basis for the last 10 years.  We would appreciate you not generalising as you are. 

On the expiration deadlines issue we believe we've made our point clear in our article already.

Thanks for your kind comments Spanishsolicitor. 






_______________________
Lawbird Spanish Lawyers http://www.lawbird.com



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 11:44 AM by mariadecastro Star rating in Algeciras (Cadiz). 9402 posts Send private message

mariadecastro´s avatar
With all my respect and not wanting to make you feel we are attacking you, Lawbird, let me expose some differences against your statement. Believe us,it is not our intention to attack lawyers but to deffend our clients. Anyway.. it is also true that we loce to call things by their names.

I am quoting you: " The developer is not obliged to include said clause and we cannot force them to"   Both developer is obligued to include said clause : please find below translation of the contract advised by the Consumers National Institute :

http://www.eyeonspain.com/spain-magazine/sample-contract.aspx   ( See section fifth)


and provivion 2 of Law 57/68:  

http://www.eyeonspain.com/spain-magazine/bank-guarantee-legal.aspx

and of course Lawyers, who are supossed to know Law, can or.... I would say are imperatively obligued to force developers to issue bank Guarantees for their cleints. As part of their jobs for protecting clients rights. Any other behaviour is a serious negligence.






This message was last edited by mariadecastro on 9/5/2008.

_______________________

Maria L. de Castro, JD, MA

Lawyer

Director www.costaluzlawyers.es

El blog de Maria



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 12:00 PM by Chrissie1 Star rating in UK. 384 posts Send private message

Chrissie1´s avatar
Now this problem with BG's has been going on for years in Spain is it possible to finally put it right and all lawyers should make sure that as a receipt is given for monies paid at the same time a BG should be issued ' NO Bank guarantee, NO money' .  Please sort this out once a for all, take responsibility for your job please.

Chrissie

_______________________

               
Chrissie   



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 12:24 PM by Lawbird Star rating. 59 posts Send private message

Lawbird´s avatar

María yet again an unwarranted attack on us.

Why don't you read carefully what we've written in our posts and you might want to reconsider you offensive post.

We are refering to the special clause which, we repeat once more, is not obligatory.

Developers are of course obliged under law, Law 57/68, to hand over said BGs to off-plan purchasers, we've never written the contrary as you post mistakenly. In fact we've written an article saying just that, it's the first post in this thread if you haven't noticed. I think you are confusing issues, again.

Have you actually bothered to take the time to read through our article before you have us again under your flak ? 




This message was last edited by Lawbird on 9/5/2008.

_______________________
Lawbird Spanish Lawyers http://www.lawbird.com



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 12:44 PM by alamred Star rating. 242 posts Send private message

for anoyone wanting to test water with lawbird:_

Spain Law Firm, Attorney Spain - Lawbird

Lawbird Legal Services Edificio Alfil Floor 4 Ricardo Soriano, 19 - 4B 29601 Marbella Malaga (Spain) Contact Form Phone: +34 952 861890 ...
www.lawbird.com/ - 14k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 1:21 PM by mariadecastro Star rating in Algeciras (Cadiz). 9402 posts Send private message

mariadecastro´s avatar
Again, I disagree: The clause mentioning the Guarantee is obligatory under Law 57/68, Decree 218/2005 on Information for Real Estate consumers in Andalucia and draft advised by the National Institute of Consumers.

Anyhow, Lawbird..... I have no time to spend on discussions with you as you seem to take everything personally.  It is such a shame.

WIshing you all the best in your practice,

Best regards,

Maria L. de Castro



_______________________

Maria L. de Castro, JD, MA

Lawyer

Director www.costaluzlawyers.es

El blog de Maria



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 3:11 PM by Chrissie1 Star rating in UK. 384 posts Send private message

Chrissie1´s avatar

I think the point is being missed AGAIN.  Please read Andenca's post and digest it ,it is very simple and very true.  

Have a very nice weekend cancelling all those contracts from british buyers who are at present continuing to lose out every time because of lack of information and action which is supposed to be given to them from their lawyers/representatives.

Regards

Chrissie (not a lawyer and proud of it).



_______________________

               
Chrissie   



Like 0      
05 Sep 2008 4:12 PM by Lawbird Star rating. 59 posts Send private message

Lawbird´s avatar

María posts : 

Again, I disagree: The clause mentioning the Guarantee is obligatory under Law 57/68, Decree 218/2005 on Information for Real Estate consumers in Andalucia and draft advised by the National Institute of Consumers.

Anyhow, Lawbird..... I have no time to spend on discussions with you as you seem to take everything personally.  It is such a shame.

María you have misunderstood, again.

You think we are refering to a clause within a Private Purchase Contract in which -as you rightly point out it- there must be a reference to the issued BGs securing the interim payments of the purchaser as featured in detail in your article with your sample PPC on it's 5th clause regarding BGs. We completely agree with your comment it's in art 2 of Law 57/68. Where have we posted the contrary ?  

The fact is that we are referring to another clause, this one: "aval a primer requerimiento" following our own article and in reply to Andenca's post in which he/she expressly mentions it. It is not mandatory to include it in a BG as you affirm so categorically. Law 57/68 doesn't even mention it as I'm sure you will confirm.

So you have started a rant on a point you have misunderstood entirely. We think an apology is due after your aggressive post.  

I remind you we have at no time attacked you, in fact, the only time we happen to mention you is in reply to posts such as the above. We have you in high regard María but you are coming across as slightly overzealous in your views and posts.

We would appreciate likewise not having to spend our time in futile discussions with you when we are in reality saying the same things, exactly the same María.



_______________________
Lawbird Spanish Lawyers http://www.lawbird.com



Like 0      

Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | Next |

Post reply    Start new thread


Previous Threads

First Occupancy Licence - 12 posts
FOR SALE:Ford Galaxy -2002 -1.9Tdi - 7 Seater -Superb Condition - €9,950ono - Mijas Costa-Tel:0034 610872869 - 0 posts
Is anybody there - 9 posts
Vocational Skills Training... - 1 posts
One Year On - 1 posts
Mums and tots, Dads and tots, Friendship in Spain, lonely in Spain. - 5 posts
Mums and tots, Dads and tots, Friendship in Spain, lonely in Spain. - 25 posts
Mums and tots, Dads and tots, Friendship in Spain, lonely in Spain. - 0 posts
Repossession - 37 posts
Renewed attacks in La Linea - 2 posts
Hot Property! IT professional moving to Spain. Limited offer - 0 posts
Hello from Portugal - 1 posts
Boletins - 1 posts
Empployment Offers - 2 posts
Amba Sun - 3 posts
Benalmadena Pueblo or Torreblanca? - 2 posts
Sound advice - 0 posts
can i use my uk driving licence in spain permenently?? - 16 posts
I plan to start a business in Spain sooooooon! - 16 posts
Travel Insurance? - 4 posts
Iberbanda & Telefónica - 4 posts
Help me make the right decision - 6 posts
125cc Scooter for sale - 7 posts
new owners - 1 posts
Toyota Corolla Verso 2.2 D4D Sport 177cv For Sale - 0 posts

Number of posts in this thread: 42

DISCLAIMER:  All opinions posted on these message boards are the opinion solely of the poster and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Eye on Spain, its servants or agents.


1 | 2 | 3 |
Our Weekly Email Digest
Name:
Email:


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x