20 Aug 2012 2:05 PM:

 Thank you so much to all the people who have replied and assisted me with this problem.  It appears that some communities are applying rules and regulations at whim even though they may have checked things out with their administrators.  Apparently the administrators for our community do not see anything wrong in treating property owners and tenants differently.  In most cases, property owners and tenants do not know their rights and are unsure how to ascertain the legalities of them. 

Thread: Change of statute

--------------------------------------

16 Aug 2012 12:00 PM:

 At our latest AGM the vice president proposed to adopt a statute in the constitution prohibiting rental tenants from housing pets. It was proposed that the community does not become a home for rental owners who have pets and that any tenant renting property is excluded from housing any form of pet.

Surely this is discrimination against tenants...and what is the difference between a property owner having a pet and a tenant?  Surely it is up to the individual owner's discretion on allowing their tenant to have a pet.  As far as I am aware this cannot be applied and that property owners and tenants cannot be treated differently.

Could someone please point me in the right direction to determine if this is legal or not.

Thread: Change of statute

--------------------------------------

19 Jun 2007 8:40 AM:

I would like to know where we stand with the Court of Human Rights regarding breach of contract by Huma, witholding money paid to them, not issuing bank guarantees as per contract. Surely we have the 'right' to have our money returned to us without waiting until the day before a court date when Huma miraculously come up with the money WITHOUT interest. Huma seem to be getting away with an awful lot!

Thread: What would you like to know about?

--------------------------------------