All EOS blogs All Spain blogs  Start your own blog Start your own blog 

El blog de Maria

Your daily Spanish Law reporter. Have it with a cafe con leche. www.costaluzlawyers.es

Legal tip 1208. Refreshing the clear ideas on European Enforcement Orders EEO
Tuesday, September 23, 2014 @ 12:42 PM

RIGHTS TO DEFENCE

The Spanish Bank trying to enforce a mortgage debt using an  EEO for the seizure of UK assets, need of course to follow the procedural rules in Spain first as if not, there will  be no debt to be established as Internationally enforceable by the said order.

If a Bank obtained an EEO without serving legal notice of repossession to the debtor and/or without giving to the debtor the legally required possiblities for contest and defence, you, the debtor, in the UK, who would see your UK goods "at risk" will have rights to contest the issuing and the enforcing of the EEO as null and void as well as lack of due procedure after mortagge default.

Rights to defence is one of the most important rights of our Constitution and every State of Law and it has of course been fully covered when the EU created the EEO.

It is important to remark here that  opposition rights for Spanish mortgages´debtors have been clrearly strengthened by the ECJ ( European Court of Justice) recently.

THREE KEY IDEAS TO TAKE INTO GOOD ACCOUNT

1) The claim needs to be uncontested

2) The European Regulation stablishes minimum standards with regard to the service of documents (the document instituting proceedings and, where applicable, the  summons to a court hearing) to ensure that the rights of the defence are respected. Only the document service methods listed in the Regulation are allowed if the judgment is to be certified as a European enforcement order.

3) The competent court in the enforcing Member State may, subject to certain conditions,refuse to enforce a judgment if it is irreconcilable with an earlier judgment given in any Member State or in a third country. In certain cases, it can also stay or limit enforcement.

Sevilla, South western Spain, at facebook.com

 

 



Like 1




5 Comments


antifreeze said:
Tuesday, September 23, 2014 @ 4:56 PM

Well - some good news for EU buyers who have lost so much already! Thank you God.

I believe everyone should contest and challenge or the developers and banks assume no opposition, which puts them in a stronger position later in courts. NO ONE should be forced to give up their home (it is not an investment) to satisfy the greed of banks and developers who have already profited from our losses. I hope this will send out a clear message and let people get on with their lives, where ever they live in the EU.

Question - does this law/rule apply to developers who try to take assets in UK, with threats by bailiffs based out side the UK?

Thanks Maria



mariadecastro said:
Wednesday, September 24, 2014 @ 9:06 AM

Dear Antifreeze:

Question - does this law/rule apply to developers who try to take assets in UK, with threats by bailiffs based out side the UK?

Answer- Of course it does. It applies to every debt in a foreign country.


antifreeze said:
Wednesday, September 24, 2014 @ 12:20 PM

Dear Maria - thank you for this information. I hope many will see it and respond as this is an important issue for UK buyers who have lost their homes and deposits in Spain.

There are many people locked in to situations, not 'acting' for fear of losing cases based on the few reports of settlement in favour of clients. The news/information seems sporadic and unreliable across the country.

Many people look at your blogs and take heed of what is happening - we hear about the changes, developments in legal cases which is very good for ordinary consumers who are 'unable' to act - lack of funds and negative outcomes? This may give them some hope to take action; if everyone did, then it might impact on banks, lost deposits, developers who have failed in their duty to contracts.

We are grateful for your postings - perhaps it is time, with these cases at the forefront, for more people who have been wronged by the Spanish system, to take up some cohesive action to add strength to the legal complexities in these cases of unfair contracts, over-pricing and illegal intimidation with enforcement.




mariadecastro said:
Wednesday, September 24, 2014 @ 12:35 PM

Thanks Antifreeze! It is not being easy at all!
But, yes, this is the era of informed buyers and consumers. Judges are interpreting Law very much to their protection. I am satisfied despite there is much work ahead.
I would love to see a solution for people who are paying mortgages on illegal--- non licensed--- properties


ads said:
Saturday, September 27, 2014 @ 12:55 PM

Thank you Maria.

Aren't there continuing risks for those who are endeavouring to recoup their deposited monies following breach of contract, so long as inconsistent judicial rulings place them at risk of being forced to complete, and then be subjected to European enforcement orders if they refuse to comply with court rulings calling for completion?

How will this work for those subjected to European Enforcement orders following Spanish contra legem rulings (i.e. inconsistent judicial rulings that failed to safeguard inalienable rights and adhere to Ley 57/68) so long as the Supreme Court do not admit cases for consideration and thereby overrule, or alternatively allow recent SC rulings that now recognise inalienable rights to be used to counter enforcements of this nature?

Aren't purchasers still at risk of having their UK assets seized (savings, or home, or forced to take out a mortgage if eligible), if they refuse to comply with the Spanish contra legem rulings and subsequent enforced completion?

Or will the purchaser be given an opportunity in the UK (or EU) to realistically defend their inalienable rights, or is this not permitted after a final judicial ruling has been issued in Spain?

Are there any current European Directives in place which could take precedence over such contra legem rulings, to protect inalienable rights as per existing law Ley 57/68, or are such directives subordinate to Spanish final rulings?

Consistency of judicial rulings with regard to Ley 57/68 in its entirety becomes imperative, and so long as this cannot be guaranteed across all autonomous regions in Spain, aren't purchasers at continuing risk?

How are innocent purchasers ultimately protected against contra legem rulings if the SC are not willing to admit cases for consideration or be prepared to overrule subsequent enforcements?


Only registered users can comment on this blog post. Please Sign In or Register now.




 

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x