29 Jun 2011 5:46 PM:

This just proves why there has been so many problems, when people even mix the developer up with a 'main player' and reputable Spanish company.
Says a lot if correct.

Community thread: San Jose's Latest Construction

--------------------------------------

23 Mar 2011 9:44 PM:

Well yes, I would agree that the developer, having taken much if not all of the money of many, know they are reasonable quite safe against legal action being taken against them by many, as no doubt they will be the first to tell them what the legal costs will be to make a challenge.
Fear can be so painfull on times.
They did need time to 'sort' matters out before they could go ahead with the development, so it is claimed. I certainly believe that the more time they have to 'SORT' things out, the better it is for them.
Oh, I do hope people are holding too much hopes of seeing what they paid a fat deposit for.

Community thread: Plan B

--------------------------------------

11 Mar 2011 5:15 PM:

As it is an 'open' forum, doesn't that mean that anyone, be they purchasers or not, can contribute, and as an 'open' forum, purchasers do not have to identify the plot or plots they tried to purchase.
How can a non-purchaser influence the administration process when they have nor right of say or vote?
They may wish to make a comment or statement and it is up to the purchasers to believe what they want. Surely a purchaser is not gong to belive blindly what is written on an open forum?
Regarding influencing purchasers, if a person is so naive to believe without questioning what is read on a forum, they need guidance from both the 'fors' and 'against'.
The undue concern comment, I think the concern that purchaser have experienced to date far exceeds what non-purchasers may try to influence them with.
Always best to look at both sides of a story or argument in any case.
Many purchasers may have identified their plots and many haven't which they are entitled to.
Are you saying that on behalf of the developer, you can and are authorised to confirm that purchaser stating their plot number in no way assist HdT.
You see, they may have a good idea of our collective opinion already (sorry, they should not have a good idea, they should know), but they are unaware of individual actions at this moment in time and forwarned can make forearmed, as I am certain you will agree.

 

Community thread: SARC January report & additional documents

--------------------------------------

11 Mar 2011 1:40 PM:

Why is it you insist on asking confidential information from contributors. Do you realise that giving such information could back-fire on writers. I am sure that there may be reasons the person does not wish to divulge, like myself, otherwise he/she and I would have volunteered it.
It could well be that the developer would love to know who is for them and who is against. Ever given that a thought.
Good luck with your efforts and you go your way and leave others to do as they see fit.

 

Community thread: SARC January report & additional documents

--------------------------------------

10 Mar 2011 9:35 AM:

If people are of similar opinions it does not mean they are the same person, otherwise are we to assume that any comments in support of the SARC route are written by the same person?
In fact as your comments regarding SARC and my opinion are similar, does that mean we are the same person?
I considered that I had some information which I posted on here and what happened?

Community thread: Hdt Questionaire

--------------------------------------