25 Oct 2007 7:23 PM:
Val
I posted the following:
If you're not happy with Andersons, and you think that they're ripping you off, then sack them. Haven't you had enough problems with Huma, why stick with a doggy solicitor?
Now, anyone with an open mind, could see that I was asking why HeyHo was sticking with Andersons, if she though that they were acting in an inappropriate way. I was not myself calling them dodgy. But of course you are free to interpret what I wrote literally, in which case I did call them dodgy.
But, if we are taking what is written literally - when did I actually recommend Andersons? All I actually did was to post their details, I never recommended them. So, to answer your question - I didn't recommend Andersons in one breath and then contradict myself in another.
Do you, actually, have the details, or do you know of anyone personally, who Andersons have helped to get interest and compensation (I'll take your word for it if you post that you have), or are going on what someone (who has nothing to do with ACC) has written on a forum? I mean, if I was to post that my solicitor had arranged interest and compensation for x number of clients, would you send them your Power of Atorney, and 2000€ ? That's what 40+ people have done so far with Andersons.
Community thread:
Am I liable for my husbands debt in spain?
--------------------------------------