21 Feb 2011 4:10 AM:
Steve - Ref your comment 'All that said there is another at the end of said row of villas that is twice as high , twice as big a footprint and incorporates a storage room and built-in barbecue and sink etc. (I beleive that this property is owned by a Murcian banker and will probably become the building by which all others are judged. In my mind it is too big and has taken nobody else into consideration at all)'
I have written to Housing regarding this actual structure as it blocks my view across the 3rd & 7th greens through the gap I had between the villas from my first floor terrace. Previously I could look through the gap and see open countryside - that is now not possible.
This is the reply I received from Housing:
"I inform you that we have already communicated to the eight owners in the same situation as the villa X, in our burofax we request them to remove the pump storage brick house, because is not allowed by the Entity bylaws,
Some of them have requested to set out this item in the next Entity AGM that will take place the next 3dr of June, because they want to suggest to change the article that does not allow this sort of construction.
Then the owners must vote this item, if at last they cannot change the article and they do not want to remove it, the owners must vote to go against them through the court.
Then we must wait till June".
I am a very reasonable person and certainly not one to make a fuss but I do feel that this type of structure should have had some type of planning permission granted with any affected parties given the opportunity to have their say before the structure was built. I have never been approached or received any correspondence prior to the building being erected so I do strongly feel that we should insist that the entity byelaws are upheld otherwise I worry what else could be erected without consideration to others.
Community thread:
Over zealous community housing
--------------------------------------