16 Sep 2009 12:00 AM:

I would be interested in hearing views on how this community can move forward after the AGM. This community is divided and will continue to be so until some people take a step back, take a look at themselves and realise the damage that they are causing to other home owners and the community as a whole.

Having won the vote to cease action against illegal builds this should surely mean a cessation of intimidation and inappropriate behaviour towards those who had voted for action.  As "Silent Majority" stated in a previous thread we took it on the chin and it still feels like we're taking it.

When the last poster on the previous thread starts bandying around phrases like imported bigots they should be sure of their facts.  To my knowledge the Spanish gentleman has not been intimidated and is subject to Spanish law like the rest of us.  An illegal build is an illegal build.

Again on the previous thread a poster states that its "OK" to party to 5, 6 or 7 in the morning.  If you are elderly or have a young family would you be happy with an all night party? As a mixed age community people must, whether they are on their annual 2 week holiday or not, respect their neighbours right to a nights sleep. This attitude shows a total lack of consideration for others and should not have to be tolerated.

 

Community thread: How can this community move forward?

--------------------------------------

12 Sep 2009 12:48 AM:

Well, well, well Sping we too are just back from Playa Golf 3 and you must have been wearing rose tinted glasses as you seem to have missed the mound of sand and the workmen at No 54 who are in the process of constructing another illegal  underbuild.

I understand that at the AGM he was told that he could build a casita to higher than the normal height but not an underbuild because it would be illegal?  Just a few days later builders arrived and got started on the underbuild despite numerous requests to cease from our President.

Total contempt for President and Community in other words just "do whatever you like" because no action will be taken against you. If this is "coming up trumps" then I think I must have been dealt a bummer of a hand.

 

I also take issue with your view that the atmosphere had greatly improved because from events which occurred during our stay I can state categorically that is not the case.

Glad to hear the Community day was such a success. Do you have any more photos Freddy?

 

 

 

 

 

Community thread: save our community by voting against any further action!

--------------------------------------

29 Jul 2009 12:43 AM:

 

First of all Sping I must also correct the statement that you made in your last post regarding my estimated cost of €60.  I have at no time suggested any figures as to costs and suggest you check you facts and attribute those details to Silent Majority instead.

Do you really think that the divisions between pro and anti illegal build property owners can or will be mended simply by the outcome of the AGM vote being to take no further action. Your suggestion for those with neighbours who have carried out illegal builds to have a polite word is really very simplistic because not all property owners are receptive to the views of others in fact some are quite gungho.  I think too many things have been said and fingers pointed for the re-establishment of good relationships in our community for a very long time.  Remember people do have long memories.

Community thread: save our community by voting against any further action!

--------------------------------------

28 Jul 2009 12:54 AM:

Freddy civility costs nothing!!!

Any assumptions I made were based on the wording of your previous email. Surely this is a forum were people can talk to each other and not be talked down by certain posters.  Was the legal advice you recieved for the whole of R3 or your own property?

 

 

Community thread: save our community by voting against any further action!

--------------------------------------

27 Jul 2009 11:26 PM:

 

In his last post Freddy states that he has "written " assurances from his lawyer that the over and under builds are not detrimental in any way to any property not directly attached to such builds so this begs the question that if your property is attached are these assurances then invalid.

May I ask why you felt the need to acquire these "written " assurances from your lawyer Freddy? Are you affected by one of these illegal builds yourself . If not why the need to go to these lengths?

I would also ask Sping how can anyone be assured that these illegal builds have been done to the satisfaction of local building control and that some have been done by property owners themselves and cowboy builders. If at some future date this illegal build causes problems with an adjoining property will Sping still stand over his statement.

All these statement from posters stating a legal action will cost this or that amount of money is all wild guessing and is simply fanning the flames and confusing people as to what the real costs might be.

 

 

 

 

Community thread: save our community by voting against any further action!

--------------------------------------