11 Jun 2019 4:57 PM:
Hello Maria
I do not fully understand the Supreme Court Rulings in these cases but does the part about ' It is enough to know or not to ignore) who knew or had to know said literally said sentence of November 2017) that the buyers were entering amounts on account of the price of homes under construction to answer for not having demands from the promoter the opening of a special account, separated and duly guaranteed......
Does this help our case? We are with Costaluz and our case was lost because the Bank would not accept that the account that our money (exact amount to the penny) was paid into an account in their Bank. They stated that the account it was paid into was not the numbered account stated on the contract with the developers/builders of our home who had gone bankrupt, but had been paid to an Estate Agent account who then paid it into the Developers Bank.
This argument was upheld by the Appeal Court when you appealed against Bank with Ley57/68, even though you had won our case against the Developers.
We have waited since December 2017 for our case to come to the Supreme Court, does this latest ruling give us some hope that when our case does come to the Supreme Court we will finally win our case and receive Justice?
Rosemary
Forum thread:
Two Recently Won Cases against banks at the Supreme Court by CostaLuz Lawyers and DeCastro teams
--------------------------------------