24 Oct 2007 10:32 PM:
Mick,
None of your previous posts have answered my question.
Firstly, you recommend a solicitor, and then you call that same solicitor dodgy - I think anyone with half a brain would wonder why you would do that. You still haven't explained why you did just that.
You seem intent on making much of your assumption that people are unhappy with Andersons - is it not natural for people who are sharing the same legal representation to ensure that they are in contact with one another? If you were being represented by a solicitor, wouldn't you prefer to be in contact with other clients, if it was a "class action" type of situation?
Information/ knowledge is power, and the more of us that are in communication with eachother, the better.
The more frequently that genuine posters engage in these petty arguments, the more Huma will be laughing at us, which is the main reason that I won't be responding to your next post - the second reason is that this is fast degenerating into a "tit for tat" thread, which was not my intention.
Remember, people (whether they are staying with ACC, or pulling out) are jittery enough, without you or others trying to cause unrest and trouble where there is none.
I think it's best if we leave it there, however I do genuinely wish you all the best, whatever you choose to do.
Community thread:
Am I liable for my husbands debt in spain?
--------------------------------------