27 May 2008 3:57 AM:
Thank you "Joe 1" for your comments ... I was not unduly concerned abot the comments made by "rough diamond" ... his behaviour is perhaps epitomised in his handle ... say no more. I feel any and all comments made on this site concerning the behaviour of Trampolin Hills ... REGARDLESS of the development ... are highly relevant to us all. The degree of missinformation peddled by the company is far from helpful and the manner in which they respond somewhat shabby. The first time I used the site with my "Bayside" handle was yesterday and whilst the point you make about anonimity is
WELL TAKEN I had simply felt that it was time to stand up and be counted ... too many individuals have appeared not have the courage of their convictions in the past; that said
YOU ARE RIGHT! My exposure of the truth concerning GT has done is to expose a somewhat "dirty tactic" ...
WHICH DOES ABSOLUTELY NOTHING FOR THE CREDIBILITY OF EITHER GT OR ANTONIO. Just look at his post entitled "Hello Andy" and my replies.
To take the point (if indeed there was one) made by "Rough Diamond" I think the various "threads" started on what is essentially ONE problem are becoming confusing. MY comments were about GT ... his about just one development handled by GT. The reason for the company's difficulties is the same REGARDLESS of the development ... they have simply chosen to ignore their own Spanish planning regulations and taken money from clients which they have suddenly assumed to be their own personal money to do with as they wish. What needs to happen now ... REGARDLESS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ... is that we need to act together and cohesively to either (a) ensure the return of our money for breach of contract (as in my case) or (b) ensure that we get value for money and the properties we have paid for (again for the benefit of Rough Diamond) ... REGARDLESS of the development ... constructed. I personally feel that in terms of both quality and value for money ... IF WE HAD GOT WHAT WE WERE PROMISED ... GT produce a good product. Corruption amongst local officials in Spain is commonplace, construction without licences in Spain is commonplace ... where else but in Spain would we willingly part with comparitively huge sums of money without having so much as a scrap of paper to confirm ownership. Not ONE of us would have been crazy enough to do this in the UK (assuming most of us are British but I guess the same principle applies in Germany) yet we have all gone like "lambs to the slaughter" allowing the developer to run of with our money and squander it on personal luxuries ... THAT IS THE ISSUE WE NEED TO ADDRESS. "Rough Diamond" is spitting his dummy out over what he sees as HIS PERSONAL ISSUE whereas we are all in the same boat and have to sink or swim together.
Anyway, thank you Joe for having the intelligence and perception to see where I was coming from ... doom and gloom it maybe but I still feel the situation can be saved for us all and indeed with a degree of common sense prevailing GT may well be able to continue.
Community thread:
Early Retirement- E106/Insurance/Pay into System/Pay as You Go
--------------------------------------