26 May 2016 2:55 PM:

Dear Mr Gavstap 

Pilar Alonso here. As you well know we currently representing 250 clients who have lost deposit in ACC. We are preparing lawsuits and fortunately we are wining all the Cases we have presented so far. Please, feel free to contact our office in Manchester and Mrs Marta Hughes ( our legal assistant) will be more than happy to inform you about your Case. Phone number 01204328460 . I do aplogy for not been able to be as quick as clients would like. 

 

Community thread: NEW! WON CASE in FIRST INSTANCE COURT AGAINST BANCO POPULAR FOR OUR CLIENT WHO PURCHASED AN OFF-PLAN PROPERTY FROM THE DEVELOPER HUMA MEDITERRÁNEO S.L. AT ALMANZORA COUNTRY CLUB

--------------------------------------

16 Oct 2015 1:40 PM:

 

According with law 57/68, Clients are entitle to recover their principal plus legal interest from the day they made the transfer. The legal interest has been around 4%- 5%  

 

Community thread: HIGH COURT CONFIRMS THAT GENERIC BANK GUARANTEES FOR SANTA ANA ARE ENFORCEABLE

--------------------------------------

06 Oct 2015 2:31 PM:

Quiet the opposite, Law is not black and white and there is a full range of colors and interpretations… In our Law Firm makes sure that clients are well informed about all the assumptions so they can decided how much risk they want to take. 

 

It is a matter of fact that we do not know yet how Judges will interpreted the fact that a client who signed a purchase contract under the 57/68 will cancel a contract under the New Law. As you well say, a contract must be cancelled before proceeding with the released of a bank guaranteed. 

 

Every Law Firm has their own policy and ours is to make sure that our clients understand absolutely all the chances that they will or  they will not have with their Cases. 

 

Forum thread: NEW!!! - GREAT NEWS!!!! - SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS BANK LIABILITY FOR DEPOSITS UNDER LAW 57/1968

--------------------------------------

05 Oct 2015 10:28 PM:

 

It seems that my colleagues are very comfortable interpreting a New Law which it is not in force yet. We seem to forget that Judges will be the only one who will decide what it will happen with those who have bought properties under Law 57/68 and decide to cancel the contract under the New Law. Glad they are confident about this matter as I can’t see things with such a clarity.

 

 

Forum thread: NEW!!! - GREAT NEWS!!!! - SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS BANK LIABILITY FOR DEPOSITS UNDER LAW 57/1968

--------------------------------------

05 Oct 2015 10:28 PM:

 

It seems that my colleagues are very comfortable interpreting a New Law which it is not in force yet. We seem to forget that Judges will be the only one who will decide what it will happen with those who have bought properties under Law 57/68 and decide to cancel the contract under the New Law. Glad they are confident about this matter as I can’t see things with such a clarity.

 

 

Forum thread: NEW!!! - GREAT NEWS!!!! - SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS BANK LIABILITY FOR DEPOSITS UNDER LAW 57/1968

--------------------------------------