08 Dec 2011 9:40 PM:
I'm sure we all agree that a community of owners needs to be in place, then maybe some authority could be exerted to get things done on the site, ie getting rid of the fences, realistic pool opening dates, completion of facilities etc.
There is a right and wrong way of setting this up, this is not the right way. It is being forced on us at short notice. Apart from the unrealistic rules, the document is not about what is said but more what is not said, ie
How many need to be present to form a quorum.
Can the developer use the votes of unsold properties.
Insufficient detail re. cost breakdown.
Insufficient detail re management costs.
Is there a relationship between Pentagono Multiservicios and Piensa.
Whilst this company may be good at what they do, there must be efficient management companies less than 200 Km away.
Whilst we agree with others that propose to vote no to the proposals , it is not clear how to do this unless a proxy is given to someone who will attend the meeting. Is there anyone going to the meeting who would be prepared to carry proxies for those who cannot be present ?
Colin & Yvonne
Community thread:
First AGM - Setting up the community
--------------------------------------