I am led to believe this was the Gentlemans name? Malcolm who was suppose to represent the Developer.
We where told later he was an owner, WHY was there no one from Mr Saudis office there to represent him.
How friendly is Malcolm with the Promoter / Developer.
We totally understood why the developer could not be there at that time, due to a sudden family bereavement.
Malcolm was preaching about being a community and not breaking pathetic rules, I have personally been shown his breaking of the community rules, ie a conservatory added to his utility, on block three at the far end, what did he think, one rule for him and one for us, we have all seen this before.
We where wondering where the permission came from for that, who did he get the permission from.?
I believe Malcolm would not have gone and broke a rule.?
We do not have a licence yet how can he do this? and can it affect our Urbanisation from receiving our licence, I have a conversation with my lawyer he has told me we cannot do this until the licence is in place as we may not receive it because of that.
Our lawyer stated it was a closing of a room, more sqr metres added?
Also this changes the Architects design and we are led to believe we have not got the licence because 65 sqr metres has been added without permission.
What on earth is going on.
We are under the impression Malcolm may be a friend maybe a friend of yours Patric can you send him this email we would like to know the answers to that question as my wife has stated she wants this also but we have been informed from the Developers office to contact the Administration and they finally answered me stating we cannot.
I would like some answers. Who do you know that we do not and why is it, that you seem to be able to get emails and reply to your phone calls immediately but the rest of us cannot.
Deborah and Francisco do not reply unless it is a suitable time for them.
2009 is probably the right Year.
As for the Agenda , most people had never received it and it was not presented well or correctly.
Maybe a school teacher is what we need god knows but what we have at present is a farce.
As for his high moral standing we cannot accept his behaviour to some of the owners
I was told he insulted two women at that meeting and one he swore at under his breathe, which was witnessed by my wife and many others.
This attitude was disgraceful from someone , we believe has represented himself as someone we should consider to be on the board of our community, who is of high moral standing, maybe his wife who I am led to believe from my wife is a teacher, then i suggest she starts at home.
My wife kindly informed me of what went on and I have been told by many others who where at that meeting, if this is all we have to offer. God Help us, there would be no point going to another meeting.
I believe once the licences are in place if we can muster 26% of the vote we can ask for another AGM.
I personally could not make the meeting but my wife actually made it, i had work commitments i could not change, we where informed by a neighbour and they where informed from Santa Maria Developers office.
It is a pity the girls in that office where not the administrators we would get more done.
We will be contacting more people to see if we can organise an earlier AGM as another 12 months of this farce we do not want.
A better community we all agree is what we want and desire but pleading ignorance we cannot have or accept anymore.
By the way maybe Malcolm can get the lifts working from England as you cannot from Spain i know i have tried all since last week.
Jim, Spanish Living