SARC Position Statment of HdT offer

Blue Med Invest
Post reply   Start new thread
New - Old :: Old - New

Pages: 1 |

Residencial Santa Ana del Monte forum threads
The Comments
03 Apr 2010 12:00 AM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

Hi All,

The SARC Excutive committee, having read the HdT documents and discused  them,have agreed a position statement. This has now be loaded up onto the SARC website for all to be able to read and we hope that it is some help to purchasers, particularly those without BG's. The SARC Executive are all accepting the agreement and the document gives our reasoning.

  I WANT A POSTIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL

Tony R 17 18


 



This message was last edited by TonyMal on 03/04/2010.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

03 Apr 2010 9:10 PM by julie anne Star rating. 1103 forum posts Send private message

Funny why no one ever replies to the drivel on this thread probably because it is  total tosh  . Tony a  classic case of  pre vote nerves ,you are grasping at straws  !  What if it does not go your way Tony will Almu still be your friend or will you turn on her and HdT/SJ  and try to start the joint action you should have started years ago  !!!!!!!!  

The minute you get in bed with the enemy you die with them .Where are the company assets now Tony ? You and SARC bought them time to sail everyone down the river   . 

Too little too late ! Act in haste repent at leisure ! SARC  have been known as  " The Idiots " on EOS for many years they are about to prove their critics were right from day one .

SARC are HdT/SJ's puppets, no more no less you have been had Tony well and truly had not just once but twice  .It is really quite difficult  to have sympathy for someone as gullible as you  . JA

 


 



This message was last edited by julie anne on 03/04/2010.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

03 Apr 2010 10:23 PM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

 

Hi All,

As this was a new thread, I find JA's post rather bizzare and a very desperate act and must remind us all of what she posted on the vote thread:

"03 Apr 2010 14:19

Hi Vic I don't think anyone who has their money back can vote .I certainly wont be .It seems to be HdT /SJ thet are confused as they are still sending out the letters etc to some of us .I will watch with interest to see what happens ,hoping that everyone can get something back but it really does not affect me any more JA

As she is not affected why is she posting so much ? Why is it that she & the tiny BG group keep on trying to put everything down? They have BG's, a lot of us do not and they still have not been able to say how HdT being liquidated would be good news and helpful to those of us without BG's.

I repost :

Hi All,

 i WANT A POSTIVE OUTCOME FOR ALL

The SARC Excutive committee, having read the HdT documents and discused them,have agreed a position statement. This has now be loaded up onto the SARC website for all to be able to read and we hope that it is some help to purchasers, particularly those without BG's. The SARC Executive are all accepting the agreement and the document gives our reasoning.




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

03 Apr 2010 10:34 PM by julie anne Star rating. 1103 forum posts Send private message

Tony why do the majority of purchasers NOT have BGs ? Either you can not or do not want to answer this question .Perhaps if you answer it will blow your pathetic little argument to continue with this illegal company out of the water ! Your answer is Tony ?

Ps      SARC executives current  position :-  Up shit creek without a paddle

 



This message was last edited by julie anne on 03/04/2010.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

03 Apr 2010 10:47 PM by TonyMal Star rating in Oxfordshire. 1090 forum posts Send private message

 

Hi All,

I draw your attention to the crass posting from JA, a person who has posted that she is not affected by the outcome of the process. Note the snide tone, the ridicule of the plight of those without BGS. Has she said why she is doing all she can to try to stop SADM gonig ahead? No she just keeps throwing negative little remarks. A very sad and nasty  way to behave. She has known for ages that most do not have BG's ,so she is not surprised with this news but yet again does not explain why HdT being liquidate would be of benifit to those of us without BG's. But she does not care, she's not affected.

Any way she is of no consequence, each of you as purchasers are, think , choose and vote. It is in your hands to decide and i am sure that it scares JA et all that they have no control of what each of us is going to do. Me? I am voting yes & signing at a notaries next week.

 I WANT A POSTIVE OUTCOMER FOR ALL

Tony R1 718

 


 




Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

03 Apr 2010 11:19 PM by julie anne Star rating. 1103 forum posts Send private message

Tony with all due respect you have not answered the question .

Tony why do the majority of purchasers NOT have BGs ?

Why do you not go back to Almu and say everyone will vote YES tomorrow if BGs are issued immediately  for all deposits paid to date and for all future staged and upfront  payments that will be written in to  the new contracts ."Simples "

If HdT/SJ are worth a F ##k this should not be a problem .If it is a problem then the whole agreement is unlawful and they should be put into liquidation !!!!!!!!!!

Why Tony are you asking people to go against every rule in the book .  "protect your deposit and staged payments with a BG " Have we learned nothingat all  !!!!!!  are HdT/SJ above the law ?????? I think not !!!!!!!

No need for smart replies Tony just answer the question. Are purchasers going to get  BGs "SIMPLES"  ???????????? and if not why not ??????


 



This message was last edited by julie anne on 03/04/2010.



This message was last edited by julie anne on 03/04/2010.


Like 0

Spam post or Abuse? Please let us know

Pages: 1 |
Post reply   Start new thread


Previous Threads

The Vote - 13 posts
My Good News - 16 posts
Maybe Some Help - 2 posts
VOTE - 42 posts
SAVE YOUR MONEY, SAVE YOUR HOUSE,SAVE SADM! - 8 posts
The Offer from Almudena - 24 posts
Recording of SARC's last meeting with Almu - 3 posts
Porkies - 8 posts
Be in the know !!! - 0 posts
SARC March Update report. HdT letters /Website - 18 posts
ELS International Lawyers - 0 posts
6th March - 31 posts
No offer of bank Guarantees (again) - 0 posts
La for info Verdad - 3 posts
SARC February Report. THEY DO NOT WANT MORE OF YOUR MONEY. - 5 posts
Trampolin Hills, first Spanish owner lodges complain in Brussels - 0 posts
"The Biggest Con of all Cons" - They Want More of Your Money - 60 posts
Banned - 11 posts
Banks involved so far... - 11 posts
News about Ambsun - 25th January - 15 posts
Banks responsibility as per law 57/68 - 14 posts
The luxury of having a bank guarantee ??? - 4 posts
7th February - 56 posts
A Law unto themselves - 0 posts
Inclement Weather - 7 posts

6 posts were found:


1 |
Our Weekly Email Digest
Name:  
Email:
   


This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More information here. x